Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi - I vs. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Through Managing Director
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble B.V. Nagarathna
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:23 Mar 2015
CNR:SCIN010323132015
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| Ì | ITEM NO.73 | REGISTRAR COURT. 2 | SECTION IIIA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E C O U R T O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | |||
| BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA | ||||
| Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) | No(s).<br>13099/2014 | |||
| C.I.T.,DELHI | Petitioner(s) | |||
| VERSUS | ||||
| BHARTI HEXACOM LTD. | Respondent(s) | |||
| WITH<br>SLP(C) No. 13100/2014<br>(With Office Report) | ||||
| SLP(C) No. 31790/2014 | (With Interim Relief and Office Report) | |||
| Date : 14/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. | ||||
| For Petitioner(s) | Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv.<br>Mr. Chetan Chawla, Adv. | |||
| For Respondent(s) | Ms. Kavita Jha,Adv.<br>Ms. Shraddha, Adv. | |||
| UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | ||||
| SLP(C) NoS. 13099/2014 & 13100/2014 | ||||
| The<br>sole<br>respondent | has<br>failed<br>to | file<br>the<br>count | ||
| er | Signature Not Verified | affidavit within the period stipulated under the Rules.<br>that context, the matters shall be processed for listing before the | Viewed in | |
| Reason: | Hon'ble Court under the rules.<br>Digitally signed by<br>POOJA SHARMA<br>Date: 2015.08.27<br>11:05:22 IST | |||
| Item No. 73 | -<br>2<br>- | Contd2/- | ||
| SLP(C) No. 31790/2014 | Ms. Shraddha, Learned Advocate has appeared on behalf of |
the sole respondent. She seeks and is given four weeks time to
file the Vakalatnama and Counter Affidavit.
List again on 23.03.2015.
(M K HANJURA) Registrar
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search