State Of Madhya Pradesh vs. Nagar Parishad, Kailaras

\220 ITEM NO.79 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36467/2014 STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MUNABBAR KHAN & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and exemption from filing O.T.) WITH SLP(C) No. 36468/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36475/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34816/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Office Report) Date : 13/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Anil Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amlan Kumar Ghosh,Adv. Mr Praneet Pranav, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.36467/2014 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2015.05.18 10:51:45 IST Reason: Among 37 respondents herein, respondent nos. 1 to 33 and 37 have filed counter affidavit but the same is defective. Be cured within four weeks time. -2- Item No.79 Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent nos. 34 to 36. Be taken

within four weeks. Notices thereafter be issued.

SLP(C) NO.36468/2014

Among 3 respondents herein, respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit but being defective. Defects be cured within four weeks time.

Respondent no.3 has failed to file counter affidavit despite warning of last opportunity for the purpose. Further opportunity is hereby declined.

Respondent no.2 has not yet been served. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the same. Be taken within four weeks. Notices thereafter be issued. SLP(C) NO.36475/2014

Among five respondents herein, service of respondent nos. 1,2,4 and 5 is not complete. However, the ld. Counsel, Ms Priyanka Swami appearing on behalf of Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad,Advocate-on-record has appeared for respondent no.1. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit be filed within the respective stipulated time.

For the remaining three respondents, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the same. Be taken within four weeks. Notices thereafter be issued.

Respondent no.3 since has failed to file counter affidavit despite the time stipulated for the purpose stands expired, further opportunity is declined. -3-

Item No.79

SLP(C) NO.34816/2014

Service of all the 9 respondents is still awaited.

List again on 21.8.2015.

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar \220 ITEM NO.79 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36467/2014

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. Petitioner(s)

within four weeks time.

VERSUS MUNABBAR KHAN & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and exemption from filing O.T.) WITH SLP(C) No. 36468/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36475/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34816/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Office Report) Date : 13/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Anil Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amlan Kumar Ghosh,Adv. Mr Praneet Pranav, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.36467/2014 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2015.05.18 10:51:45 IST Reason: Among 37 respondents herein, respondent nos. 1 to 33 and 37 have filed counter affidavit but the same is defective. Be cured within four weeks time. -2- Item No.79 Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent nos. 34 to 36. Be taken within four weeks. Notices thereafter be issued. SLP(C) NO.36468/2014 Among 3 respondents herein, respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit but being defective. Defects be cured

Respondent no.3 has failed to file counter affidavit despite warning of last opportunity for the purpose. Further opportunity is hereby declined.

Respondent no.2 has not yet been served. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the same. Be taken within four weeks. Notices thereafter be issued. SLP(C) NO.36475/2014

Among five respondents herein, service of respondent nos. 1,2,4 and 5 is not complete. However, the ld. Counsel, Ms Priyanka Swami appearing on behalf of Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad,Advocate-on-record has appeared for respondent no.1. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit be filed within the respective stipulated time.

For the remaining three respondents, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the same. Be taken within four weeks. Notices thereafter be issued.

Respondent no.3 since has failed to file counter affidavit despite the time stipulated for the purpose stands expired, further opportunity is declined. -3-

Item No.79

SLP(C) NO.34816/2014

Service of all the 9 respondents is still awaited.

List again on 21.8.2015.

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar