The State Of Himachal Pradesh State Of Himachal Pradesh Through The Secretariat (Hppwd) vs. Kewal Ram

H Item No. 36 1

REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 29733-29736/2015

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

HUKMI RAM AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report)

WITH SLP(C) No. 30649-30652/2015 Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 1646/2016 Office Report)

Date : 02/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv.

Mr. B. S. Banthia,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary,Adv.

Mr. Suryanaryana Singh,Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 29735/2015 Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by POOJA SHARMA Date: 2016.08.02 16:13:58 IST The matter has already been directed to be listed before the

Reason:

Hon'ble Court. Therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in it. Item No. 36 2

SLP(C) No. 30649-30652/2015 Service is already complete. Viewed thus, the matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

SLP(C) No. 29733/2015

Ld. Counsel for the petitioners has failed to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

SLP(C) No. 29734/2015

Ld. Counsel for the petitioners has failed to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the respondent Nos. 4, 7 and 8 despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

SLP(C) No. 29736/2015 Ld. Counsel for the petitioners has failed to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

SLP(C) No. 1646/2016 The Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Item No. 36 3

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No. 4 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. List again on 14.9.2016.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

MG