Linga Vijayan (Dead) vs. Ramachandra Marthandam
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
1 Dec 2010
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Item No.96
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA
Civil Appeal No(s). 10190/2010
LINGA VIJAYAN & ORS.
$Appellant(s)$
VERSUS
RAMACHANDRA MARTHANDAM
Respondent(s)
Date : $28/04/2015$ This appeal was called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s) Mr. Sripradha Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the appellants and the Ld. Counsel for the respondent have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by letter dated 1.11.2011 of the Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as <sup>igna</sup> ed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special <pre>************************************ desire to file any further statement of case. The order further provides that if the respondent who has entered appearance does not
file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. Therefore, in view of the rule position cited above the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.
(M K HANJURA) Registrar
MG