Goa Foundation vs. Union Of India

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 435/2012

GOA FOUNDATION Petitioner(s)

Reason:

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (WITH REPORTS OF EXPERT COMMITTEE, MONITORING COMMITTEE AND CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE AND WITH I.A.NOS. 87-116 I.E. APPLICATIONS FOR DIRECTIONS AND PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS AND PERMISSION TO AMEND THE PRAYER CLAUSE AND OFFICE REPORT)

Date : 31/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv.(A.C.)

Mr. A.D.N. Rao (A.C.), AOR

Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury (A.C.), AOR

Ms. Aprajita Singh (A.C.), AOR

Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Adv. Ms. Neha Rathi, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Chidambaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anjuman Tripathi, Adv.

Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ninad Laud, Adv. Mr. Karan Mathur, Adv.

• Mr. Jayant Mohan, AOR
• Mr. Gourab Banerji, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ninad Laud, Adv. Ms. Vaidehi Mishra, Adv. Mr. Jayant Mohan, Adv.

Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, AOR State of Goa Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. Digitally signed by MEENAKSHI KOHLI Date: 2017.04.01 12:43:55 IST Signature Not Verified

1

Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. S.S. Rebello, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Mohan, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. M.K. Maroria, AOR Mr. S.M. Walawaikar, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, AOR Ms. Priyadarshinee Singh, Adv. Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR Ms. Anitha Shenoy, AOR Ms. Rashmi Nanda Kumar, Adv. Ms. Dharani Subramanian, Adv. Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. P.S. Narasimha, ASG Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Kiran Bharadwaj, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makkar, AOR Mr. Chander Uday Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Adv. Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv. Mr. Anuj Sharma, Adv. Ms. Niharika, Adv. Ms. Kanika Kalaiyarasan, Adv. For M/s K.J. John & Co. Mr. Arvind Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

There is a batch of I.As that are shown as one item. It is not possible to deal with all of them as one item. We, accordingly, make the following segregation:

WP (C) 435/2012 deals with the Report of the Expert Committee submitted to this Court on 12.04.2015.

2

This Report will be considered on 07.04.2017.

I.A. Nos. 87, 88 & 90

Let these I.As be listed as one batch as a separate item on 17.04.2017.

I.A. Nos. 89 and 91 to 106

Let these I.As be listed as one batch as a separate item on 24.04.2017.

I.A. No. 107

No one is present on behalf of the applicant.

I.A. No. 107 is dismissed for non-prosecution.

I.A. Nos. 108 to 113

Let these I.As be listed as one batch as a separate item on 01.05.2017.

I.A. Nos. 114 and 115

Let these I.As be listed as one batch as a separate item on 02.05.2017.

I.A. NO.116

I.A. No. 116 has already been allowed, it need not be listed again.

(Meenakshi Kohli) (Sharda Kapoor) Court Master (SH) Court Master (NS)