Ajmer Singh vs. The State Of Punjab

ITEM NO.43

COURT NO.5 $\mathbf{5}$

SECTION IV-B

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

$\mathbf{1}$

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).18984/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-05-2023 in CWP No.5755/2016 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Harvana at Chandigarh)

A.IMFR STNGH & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.173827/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $0.T.)$

WITH SLP(C) No. 19079/2023 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.174480/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $0.T.)$

Date: 03-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Piyush Beriwal, AOR Mr. Varun Chugh, Adv. Ms. Shagun Shahi Chugh, Adv. Ms. Sidrah Jami, Adv. Ms. Meera Chugh, Adv. Ms. Aisha Singh, Adv. Ms. Disha Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Mohit Joshi, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

As per the Office Report dated 02.11.2023, respondent 1. ature Not Verified 2, 4 and 5 have been served but no one has entered $\overline{A}$ $\overline{Q}_{\text{neg}}$ $\overline{A}$ $\overline{A}$ TO 16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 10:16:00 No. 1 been served, is also a functionary of the State of Puniab.

2. The Union of India appears to be the main contesting respondent in these petitions. However, no one has entered appearance on its behalf either.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, in all fairness, undertakes to serve the unserved respondents through the Standing Counsel for the State of Punjab as well as through the Central Agency. Let the needful be done within two weeks.

4. List on 22.01.2024.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)