The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii vs. Shri Chhatarpati Sahakari Kakhar Karkhana Ltd Through M. D

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 8890/2012 C.I.T BOMBAY Appellant(s) VERSUS TASGAON TALUKA S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH C.A. No. 8891/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date: 27/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu,adv. Mrs.Anil Katiyar, adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, Adv. For Respondent(s)

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

ITEM NO.92

Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

The office report indicates that the Ld.counsel for the appellant has already filed the statement of case. The office report further is that the Ld.counsel for the respondent has failed to file the statement of case although he has been notified to do so by notice dated 8.03.2011 of the Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 provides that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be $\mathbb{P}^{\frac{11.53.06}{18}}_{\text{Res}}$ esumed that he does not desire to lodge the same.

$\dots \dots \dots 2$

SECTION IIIA

In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB