Hindalco Industries Ltd vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh Thr. Its Principal Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
îIT E M NO.3 6 R E G I S T R A R COURT NO.1 S EC T I O N III S UP R E M E COUR T OF I N D I A R ECO R D OF P R OC E E D I N G S B E F O R E TH E R E G I S T R A R M.P . BHA D R A N Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1 6 5 4 0 / 2 0 0 6 P R I S M CEM E N T LIM I T E D Petitioner(s) VE R S U S STA T E OF M.P & ORS Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) WI T H SL P (C) NO. 1 4 8 8 9 of 2 0 0 7 (With office report) Date: 1 2 / 0 2 / 2 0 0 8 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Neha Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Meru Gupta, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawal a,Adv. Mr. Yogmaya Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Rohit Singh, Adv. Mr. Ashok Ku m a r Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. B.S. Banthi a,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following OR D E R SL P (C) No.1 6 5 4 0 / 2 0 0 6 There is no appear ance for respondent Nos.3 and 5. Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 have filed counter affidavit without vakalatn a m a . File vakalatn a m a in a week. SL P (C) No.1 4 8 8 9 / 2 0 0 7 There is no appear ance for respondent Nos.1 and 2. The petitioner is granted a week's time to file process fee. Issue fresh notice to respondent No.3. List again on 1 0. 4 . 2 0 0 8 . (M.P. B H A D R A N ) Registr a r