Hindalco Industries Ltd vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh Thr. Its Principal Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
7 Mar 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Item No.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 3400/2008 MOTTHOO LAL PATEL $Appellant(s)$ VERSUS STATE OF M.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH C.A. No. 3401/2008 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 3402/2008 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 3403/2008 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 6137/2008 <pre>(With Interim Relief)</pre> C.A. No. 6497/2008 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 6498/2008 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 7397/2008 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) W.P. (C) No. $376/2015$ (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : $02/03/2016$ This appeal was called on for hearing today. ture Not Verified $\mathbf{B}^{\frac{3:28.0789}{2}}$ Appellant(s) Mr. S. K. Verma, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv.
$\mathbf{1}$
Item No.1 | 2 |
---|---|
M/s. Lawyer S Knit & Co,Adv. | |
Mr. Prasanjit Pritam,Adv.<br>Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran,Adv. | |
M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. | |
Mr. U.A. Rana,Adv.<br>M/s Gagrat & Co.,Adv. | |
Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv. | |
Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. | |
For Respondent(s) | Mr. Vikas Bansal,Adv. |
Mr. B. S. Banthia,Adv. | |
Mr. Milind Kumar,Adv. | |
Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. Nos. 3400,3401,3402,3403,6137,6497,6498 and 7397/2008
The office report indicates that the Learned Counsel for the appellant has failed to comply with the terms of the order dated 21.1.2016 of this Court despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.
W.P(C) No. 376/2015
The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No. 4 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.