Hindalco Industries Ltd vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh Thr. Its Principal Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
\214ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).35849/2010
M/S HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD AND ANR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
NORTHERN COAL FIELDS LTD AND ORS Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for permission to place addl. documents on record,permission to file rejoinder affidavit and office report )
Date: 02/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Md. Rashid Saeed, Adv. Mr. Syed Shahid Hussain Rizvi,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Ms Jyoti Upadhyay, Adv. Gp.Capt.Karan Singh Bhati,Adv. Mr Anil K Pandey, Adv. Mr. B.S. Banthia ,Adv
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
The ld. Advocate, Ms Jyoti Upadhyay accepts notice
for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 whereas the ld. Advocate, Mr Anil K Pandey accepts notice for respondent No.5. Petitioner has to provide additional copies of pleadings against proper acknowledgment which is to be filed on record to avoid issuance of further notices.
Let there be fresh notice with dasti service on unserved respondent Nos. 3 and 4, which is permitted to be
served through the standing counsel, if process fee and spare copies are paid before 11.5.2012, else list before
-2-
Item No.14
the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for non-prosecution. Registry has to follow the directions as per Circular dated 19.1.2012.
If notices are issued, list again on 17.7.2012.
The ld. Advocate for the petitioner wants that copy of the AD submitted by him on 12.4.2012 shall be treated as proof of service. However, such postal acknowledgment does not have any endorsement regarding receipt of registered letter by the concerned respondent. Registry is directed to forward photocopy of such acknowledgment to the postal department. Parties shall realize that no such improper document shall be treated as proper proof of service.
Let there be proper service on respondent Nos. 3 and
Served respondents may file counter affidavit till then.
(S.G.SHAH) REGISTRAR
hj