Hindalco Industries Ltd vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh Thr. Its Principal Secretary
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:6 Dec 2010
CNR:SCIN010317962012
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| '-ITEM NO.1 | COURT NO.1 | SECTION IIIA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E | C O U R T<br>O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | |
| I.A. NOS.3-4 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.4745 OF 2006 | |||
| JAI PRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. | Appellant (s) | ||
| VERSUS | |||
| STATE OF M.P. & ORS. | Respondent(s) | ||
| (For directions, impleadment, exemption from filing O.T. and<br>office report) | |||
| With I.A. Nos.1-2 in Civil Appeal No.4990 of 2006<br>(For stay, exemption from filing O.T. and office report) | |||
| I.A. Nos.3-4 in Civil Appeal No.4991 of 2006<br>(For directions, exemption from filing O.T. and office report) | |||
| I.A. Nos.2-4 in Civil Appeal No.4992/2006<br>(For stay, exemption from filing O.T. and intervention/impleadment) | |||
| I.A. Nos.1-4 in Civil Appeal No.4993 of 2006<br>(For stay and direction) | |||
| I.A. Nos.3-4 in Civil Appeal No.2055/2009<br>(For direction/stay and exemption from filing O.T.) | |||
| I.A. Nos.27-35 in Civil Appeal No.4056-4064/1999<br>(For stay and office report) | |||
| I.A. Nos.9-11 in Civil Appeal No.4722-4724/2009<br>(For stay) | |||
| Date: 06/12/2010 | These Matters were called on for hearing today. | ||
| CORAM : | HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR | HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN | |
| For Appellant(s)<br>In CA 4745/2006: | Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Ms.<br>Ms.<br>- 2 - | S.B. Upadhyay,Sr.Adv.<br>Pawan Upadhyay,Adv.<br>Santosh Mishra,Adv.<br>Param Mishra,Adv.<br>Anesha Upadhyay,Adv.<br>Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. | 2/- |
| In CA 4990/2006: | Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. | Mr. Bhaskar P. Gupta,Sr.Adv. | |
| In CA 4991/2006: | Mr. A.K. Ganguli,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Bharat Sangal,Adv.<br>Ms. Alka Singh,Adv. | ||
| In CA 4992/2006: | Mr. P.P. Singh,Adv.<br>Mr. Inderjeet Yadav,Adv. | Mr. Akshat Shrivastava,Adv. | |
| In CA 4993/2006: | Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv.<br>Mr. Mohit Paul,Adv.<br>Ms. Shagun Matta,Adv. |
| In CA 2055/2009: | Mr.<br>L.N. Rao,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Mahesh Agarwal,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Rishi Agrawala,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>E.C. Agrawala,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Gaurav Goel,Adv. |
|---|---|
| CA 4722-24/1999: | In CA 4056-64/1999 and Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Aparesh Kumar Singh,Adv.<br>Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh,Adv. |
| For Respondent(s) | Mr.<br>Vivek Tankha,ASG.<br>Mr.<br>Rishabh Sancheti,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Sumeer Sodhi,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Vaibhav Srivastava,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>D. Kumanan,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>B.S. Banthia,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. |
| Mr.<br>Parag P. Tripathi,ASG.<br>Mr.<br>T.S. Doabia,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr.<br>A. Deb Kumar,Adv.<br>Ms.<br>Asha G. Nair,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>V.K. Biju,Adv.<br>Ms.<br>Arti Gupta,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Manpreet Singh Doabia,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>D.S. Mahra,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>V.K. Verma,Adv. | |
| Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Ambhoj Kumar Sinha,Adv.<br>Mr. Ashwarya Sinha,Adv.<br>3/-<br>- 3 - | |
| Mr. Dipankar Gupta,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv.<br>Mr. Anurag Sharma,Adv.<br>M/s. AP & J Chambers,Advs. | |
| Mr. Anupam Lal Das,Adv.<br>Mr. Abhishek Kumar,Adv. | |
| Mr.<br>Harish N. Salve,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Ajay Aggarwal,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Siddharth Banthia,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Rajan Narain,Adv. | |
| For Intervenor(s) | Mr. T.N. Rao,Adv. |
| UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | |
| before<br>us,<br>Statute.<br>any<br>matter | Heard learned counsel on both sides.<br>We direct each of the assessees, appearing<br>to<br>file<br>Returns<br>under<br>the<br>relevant<br>If<br>they<br>have<br>filed<br>the<br>Returns,<br>the<br>Assessing Officer will complete the assessment by a<br>reasoned order in accordance with law.<br>If that<br>order is against the assessee(s), the assessee(s)<br>should prefer an appeal in accordance with law.<br>If<br>is<br>pending<br>before<br>the<br>Appellate<br>Authority in appeal, the Appellate Authority will<br>decide the matter in accordance with law.<br>It is<br>made clear that, pending appeal(s), every assessee<br>will pay the taxes without prejudice to its rights<br>and contentions in the pending appeal(s). |
The interlocutory applications are, accordingly, disposed of. Place Civil Appeal Nos.4056-4064 of 1999 and connected matters on 13th January, 2011, subject to over-night part-heard, if any.
[ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search