Sanjay Chaudhary vs. High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Registrar General

\236 ITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTI ON X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 851/2014 SANJAY CHAUDHARY AND ORS Petitioner( s) VERSUS HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD AND ORS ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and office report) WITH W.P.(C) No. 852/2014 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 860/2014 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) Date : 01/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhisth Kumar,Adv. Ms. Preetika Dwivedi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for respondent No.2 has acknowledged to receive the pleadings. Time is requested to file the counter affidavit. The same is objected by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner mentioning that the pleadings were provided w ay back in September, 2015. Proof of service thereof is o n record dated 15.9.2015. In view thereof, the time stipulated Signature Not Verified for Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.12.03 respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit stan ds 10:33:50 IST Reason: expired. No further opportunity can be granted to file the counter affidavit. Item No.35 -2 The Ld. Counsel for respondent No.1 has mentioned that counter affidavit of respondent No.1 was filed in January, 2015 itself. The same is perused as correct. Accordingly, the order dated 9.9.2015 having an error apparent on record is hereby reviewed. Counter affidavit be taken on record for respondent No.1. The Ld. Counsel has also stated that the same counter affidavit was opted for respondent No.1 in the remaining both the petitions. Registry to take the note thereof and to process three of these writ petitions to be listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar