Sanjay Chaudhary vs. High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Registrar General

SECTION X

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA

Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 851/2014

SANJAY CHAUDHARY AND ORS

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD AND ORS ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and office report) WITH $W.P.(C)$ No. 852/2014 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. $860/2014$

(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report)

Date: 01/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Adv. Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

The Ld. Counsel for respondent No.2 has acknowledged to receive the pleadings. Time is requested to file the counter affidavit. The same is objected by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner mentioning that the pleadings were provided way back in September, 2015. Proof of service thereof is on record dated 15.9.2015. In view thereof, the time stipulated $\frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial \mathbf{r}}$ respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit stands expired. No further opportunity can be granted to file the counter affidavit.

The Ld. Counsel for respondent No.1 has mentioned that counter affidavit of respondent No.1 was filed in January, 2015 itself. The same is perused as correct. Accordingly, the order dated 9.9.2015 having an error apparent on record is hereby reviewed. Counter affidavit be taken on record for respondent No.1. The Ld. Counsel has also stated that the same counter affidavit was opted for respondent No.1 in the remaining both the petitions. Registry to take the note thereof and to process three of these writ petitions to be listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar