Ramvilas S. Lohiya vs. The State Of Maharashtra

SLP(Crl.)No.6601/20 etc. 1

ITEM NO.5 Court 1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).6601/2020

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15-10-2020 in CRLA No.6982/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SACHIN Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.132668/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.132667/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 6440/2020 (II-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.130463/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.130462/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(Crl) No.6674/2020 (II-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.133762/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 08-07-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Adv. Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. Mr. C.Aravind, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Zafar M. Pathan, Adv. Mr. Syed Ahmed Saud, Adv. Mr. Daanish Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mr. Mohd.Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. For M/S. Shakil Ahmad Syed, AOR Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV Date: 2021.07.08 17:23:47 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

…………..2/-

The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Issue notice.

Mr. Mohd.Parvez Dabas, learned counsel, who appears on caveat on behalf of the sole respondent in SLP(Crl.)No.6440/2020 and respondent Nos.2 and 3 in SLP(Crl.)No.6674/2020 accepts notice and waives service of formal notice upon the said respondents.

Four weeks' time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

Tag with SLP(Crl.)…...D.No.8224/2020.

Until further orders, there shall be stay of operation of the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)