The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Collector vs. Vijay Singh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.62 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32082/2016
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/08/2016 in FCA No. 216/2015 12/08/2016 in CA No. 385/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)
RANJEET NABHA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UDITA NABHA Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief and office report)
Date : 28/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.
- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Virmani, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Jyoti Prakash Sahu, Adv. Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Swati Sumbly, Adv. Mr. Suman Jyoti Khaitan, Adv.
- Mr. Shadan Farasat, Adv. (Not Present)
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard the learned senior counsel appearing on both the sides.
We find no reason to entertain this Special Leave Petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed. Digitally signed by JAYANT KUMAR ARORA Date: 2016.12.23 11:08:06 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
However, the petitioner is granted a period of two months to deposit the amount as directed by the High Court, making it
clear that in case the amount, as above, is not deposited within the stipulated time, the appeal before the High Court shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of.
(Jayant Kumar Arora) Court Master
(Renu Diwan) Assistant Registrar