Tamilmani vs. Kannaiya
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
5 Oct 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).7887/2012 (From the judgment and order dated 06/07/2012 in CRLRC No. 812/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS BENCH AT MADURAI) RAGHAVAN CHETTIAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS KANNAIYA & ANR Respondent(s) (With application for ex-parte stay, exemption from filing Official Translation and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 7934 of 2012 [TAMILMANI V. KANNAIYA & ANR.] (With application for ex-parte stay, exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing official translation and office report) Date: 19/10/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Ravi Shankar, Adv. Ms. S. Yamunah Nachiar, Adv. MS. Sargam, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find on a reading of the impugned order in para 13 that the High Court has held that the learned Sessions Judge has passed a detailed order based on the materials placed before it to | | |indicate that there was a prima facie case against the petitioners (Accused | |Nos. 11 and 12). We call upon the learned counsel for the petitioners to | |place on record all material which were placed before the learned Sessions | |Judge. | |This may be done within a period of two weeks. | |List thereafter. | | | |[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[SHARDA KAPOOR] | |COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |