Shaik Kareem vs. Mohd. Khursheed Ali (D) By Lrs
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ÐITEM NO.49 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28694/2010 (From the judgement and order dated 18/06/2010 in SA No. 966/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD) SHAIK KAREEM Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHD.KHURSHEED ALI Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for substitution,directions and prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 21/02/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Sridhar Reddy, Adv. Mr. Leela Sarveswar, Adv. Mr. V.N. Raghupathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs.D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I. A. No. 3 of 2011 - Application for substitution of legal representatives of the sole respondent is allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks two weeks' time to file response in I.A. No. 2 of 2011 - Application for directions. Stand over for two weeks. List on 14.03.2011.
(NIDHI CHUGH) (RENUKA SADANA) Sr. P.A. Court Master