The International Spirits And Wines Association Of India Authorised Signatory Mr. Rajiv Chauhan vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare Secretary

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.9 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16308/2007 (From the judgement and order dated 29/08/2007 in CWP No. 1966/2003 of The HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR) ANKUR GUTKHA Petitioner(s) VERSUS INDIAN ASTHAMA CARE SOCIETY & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) with IA NO.1 (application for intervention) IA NO.8 (application for impleadment) IA NO.12-15 (applications for impleadment) IA NO.16 (application for impleadment) IA NO.17 (application for impleadment) IA NO.18 (application for impleadment) IA NO.19 (application for intervention/impleadment) IA NO.20 (application for impleadment) IA NO.21 (application for impleadment/intervention) IA NO.22 (application for Directions) IA NO.23 (application for intervention) WITH SLP(C) NO. 16314 of 2007 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 16317 of 2007 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 19467-19469 of 2007 (With appln.(s) for file addl. documents and with prayer for interim relief and office report) with IA NO.19-21 (application for direction) IA NO.22-24 (applications for impleadment) IA NO.25-27 (applications for intervention) IA NO.28-30 (applications for clarification) IA NO.31-33 (application for intervention) Date: 13/04/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. 2 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Vivek Kohli, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Swaroop, Adv. [in SLP(C) No.16308/2007] Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr.Adv. Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. K.C. Dua, Adv. [for Miraj Products Pvt. Ltd.] For Applicant(s) Dr. Rajiv Dhawan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Goswami, Adv. Mr. V.A. Mohta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shashibhishan P. Adgaonkar, Adv.

Æ1 1

Mr. Kundan Kumar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Farooqui Raza, Adv. Mr. Ajai Tandon, Adv. Mr. R.R. Deshpande, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Behari Tewari, Adv. Mr. Raj Kumar Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Shivam Sharma, Adv. Ravi Kumar Tomar, Adv. Mr. Anand Grover, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Pathak, Adv. Mr. Ajit Gupta, Adv. For State of Mr. K.N. Bhat, Sr. Adv. Karnataka Mr. K.M. Natraj, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gopal Subramanium, S.G. Mr. Anand Varma, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rathore, Adv. Mr. P.P. Rao, Sr.Adv. Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr.Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. 3 Ms. Bina Madhvan, Adv. Mr. Brijesh Kolappa, Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Pravin H. Parekh, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sameer Parekh, Adv. Mr. Lalit Chauhan, Adv. For Parekh & CO., A.O.R. Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr.Adv. Mr. Nalin Talwar, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv. Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr.Adv. Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjai K. Pathak, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kr. Sethi, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Adv. Mr. Akshat Hansaria, Adv. Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr. Vivek Kohli, Adv. Mr Abhishek Swaroop, Adv. [for respondent nos.11 & 13 in SLP(C) Nos. 19467-19469/2007] UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the applications filed for impleadment/intervention are disposed of by granting permission to the applicants to act as intervenors in the proceedings of these cases. All the writ petitions involving challenge to the Rules of 2011 be connected with this batch of

Learned Solicitor General assures that copies of the report, which was placed before the Court on 17.2.2011 will be made available to the counsel representing the parties and intervenors within a maximum period of two weeks from today. All the petitioners and intervenors may file their responses within four weeks. The official respondents are granted leave to file consolidated reply to all the writ petitions/special leave petitions and the responses which may be filed by the parties and intervenors. This must be done within a period of four weeks after expiry of the time fixed for filing the reply and responses. All the cases be listed on July 20, 2011. It is made clear to the parties and intervenors that hearing shall not be adjourned on the ground of non-availability of the learned counsel for particular party or intervenor.

(A.D. Sharma) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master