The International Spirits And Wines Association Of India Authorised Signatory Mr. Rajiv Chauhan vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
22 Sept 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ü\2071 ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.8 SECTIONs. XVIA/IX/X/XI/XV/IVA/PIL(W) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Case (Civil) No(s). 1/2010 CENTRAL ARECANUT MARKETING COPN.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA Respondent(s) WITH T.C.(C) No. 6/2010 T.C.(C) Nos. 12-14/2014 T.C.(C) No. 15/2014 T.C.(C) No. 16/2014 W.P.(C) No. 344/2011 W.P.(C) No. 330/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) T.C.(C) No. 95/2012 (With appln.(s) for impleadment) T.C.(C) No. 10/2014 T.C.(C) No. 11/2014 W.P.(C) No. 141/2011 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 354/2011 (With appln.(s) for amendment of the petition and interim relief and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 572/2013 (With office report) W.P.(C) No. 289/2011 (With appln.(s) for directions and intervention and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 69/2011 (With appln.(s) for directions and impleadment and Office Report) T.C.(C) No. 9/2014 SLP(C) No. 16308/2007 (With appln.(s) for directions and impleadment and interim directions and intervention and urging addl. grounds and Interim Relief and Office Report) 2 SLP(C) Nos. 19467-19469/2007 (With appln.(s) for clarification and clarification/direction and exemption from filing O.T., impleadment and permission to file affidavit and seeking permission to raise additional grounds and interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16314/2007 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 348/2011 In SLP(C) Nos. 19467-19469/2007 SLP(C) No. 16317/2007 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 37/2012 In SLP(C) No. 16308/2007 CONMT.PET.(C) No. 288/2011 In SLP(C) No. 16308/2007 CONMT.PET.(C) No. 236/2011 In SLP(C) No. 16308/2007 (With Office Report) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 356/2011 In SLP(C) No. 16308/2007 W.P.(C) No. 304/2011 (With appln.(s) for Amendment of the petition and Office Report) T.C.(C) No. 4/2010 T.C.(C) No. 18/2014 SLP(C) Nos. 4165-4166/2013 (With Office Report) T.P.(C) No. 144/2015 T.C.(C) No. 21/2014 T.C.(C) No. 22/2014 T.C.(C) No. 8/2016 T.C.(C) No. 7/2016 T.C.(C) No. 6/2016 T.C.(C) No. 5/2016
T.C.(C) No. 2/2010 T.C.(C) No. 3/2010 W.P.(C) No. 131/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 32162/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 147/2013 (With appln.(s) for stay and Office Report) 3 SLP(C) No. 32163/2012 (With Office Report) T.C.(C) No. 5/2010 T.C.(C) No. 25/2010 (With appln.(s) for clarification and Stay) T.C.(C) No. 20/2014 T.C.(C) No. 38/2014 T.C.(C) No. 36/2014 T.C.(C) No. 37/2014 T.C.(C) No. 19/2014 T.C.(C) No. 34/2014 T.C.(C) No. 33/2014 T.C.(C) No. 35/2014 SLP(C) No. 28716/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 182/2011 (With Office Report) T.P.(C) No. 143/2015 T.P.(C) No. 98/2015 (With Office Report) T.P.(C) No. 21/2015 (With Office Report) T.P.(C) No. 1919/2014 (With appln.(s) for stay and Office Report) T.C.(C) No. 24/2014 T.C.(C) No. 25/2014 T.P.(C) No. 77/2015 (With appln.(s) for ex-parte stay and Office Report) T.P.(C) No. 91/2015 (With appln.(s) for ex-parte stay and Office Report) T.P.(C) No. 76/2015 (With appln.(s) for stay and Office Report) T.P.(C) No. 111/2015 (With appln.(s) for stay and Office Report) Date : 23/09/2016 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL Mr. Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, Adv. Ms. Anusha Ramesh, Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Pavan Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi, Adv. Mr. Ranjith Singh, Adv. 4 Counsel for the parties: Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nalin Talwar, Adv. Mr. Vivek Kohli, Adv. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv. Ms. Anubha Singh, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Mathur, Adv. Ms. Sanjana Mohanty, Adv. Ms. Sidharth Chowdhary, AOR Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anoop George Chowdhary, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak, AOR
Ms. Shashi Pathak, Adv. Ms. A. Sumathi, AOR Mr. Shailesh Madyal, AOR Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Sr. Adv. Ms. Bina Gupta, AOR Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, AOR Mr. Subramonium Prasad, AOR Mr. Arun K. Sinha, AOR Mr. Joseph Pookkatt, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, AOR Mr. Ujjal Banerjee, Adv. Ms. Shabdita Singh, Adv. Mr. Jay Kishore Singh, AOR Mr. Satish Chandra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nagmohan Das, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mayank Pandey, Adv. Ms. Deepika Kalia, Adv. Ms. Shilpi Singh, Adv. Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mr. D. N. Goburdhan, AOR 5 UP Pollution Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. Control Board Ms. Padma Priya, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Ms. Aparna Jha, AOR Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury,AOR Mr. K. C. Dua,AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Jha,AOR Mr. Shiv Prakash Pandey,AOR M/s Temple Law Firm, Advs. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,AOR Mr. Vikas Mehta,AOR Ms. Ranjeeta Rohtagi,AOR Mr. Rakesh Dahiya,AOR F.S.S.A.I. Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Adv. Mr. Shadan Farasat, AOR Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR Mr. Nikhil Jain,AOR Mr. S. K. Verma,AOR Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. State of Bihar Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan, AOR Mr. Krishanakant Dubey, Adv. Mr. Vivek Vardhan, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR State of Karnataka Mr. K.N. Bhat, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Parikshit P. Angadi, Adv. Mr. Lagnesh Mishra, Adv. 6 Mr. Pravin H. Parekh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Lalit Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Sumit Goel, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh, Adv. Ms. Rashi Gupta, Adv.
For M/s Parekh & Co., Advs. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Mehra, Adv. Mr. Mrityunjai Singh, Adv. Mr. Piyush Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Prateek Dhir, Adv. For M/s Lawyers' Knit & Co., Advs. M/s Nuli & Nuli, Advs. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, AOR Ministry of Health Mr. A.K. Panda, Sr. Adv. & Family Welfare/ Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. MoEF Mr. R. Balasubramaniah, Adv. Ms. Sadhna Sandhu, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Aarti Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. Alok Sangwan, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Ranjit Singh, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shirin Khajuria, AOR Mr. Sajjan Poovaliya, Sr. Adv. Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajay Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Kanika Gomber, Adv. Ms. Ruchika, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain, AOR Ms. Bharti Tyagi, AOR Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Chhatisgarh Environment Ms. Yogmaya Agnihotri, Adv. Conservation Board Ms. Purnima Bhat, Adv. 7 State of Chhattisgarh Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, AOR Mr. A. Selvin Raja, Adv. Mr. Kundan Kumar Mishra, AOR State of Rajasthan Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR SDMC Mr. Rakesh Kumar, AOR State of M.P. Mr. Mishra Saurabh, AOR Mr. Purushaindra K., Adv. Ms. Anuradha Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, AOR Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, AOR Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, AOR Ms. Shally Bhasin, AOR M.C.D. Mr. R.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Virag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Aum Mangalassery, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, AOR Rajasthan State Pollution Mr. K.B. Rohatgi, AOR Control Board Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. State of U.P. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, AOR
Mr. Aviral Saxena, Adv. State of J & K Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. L.C. Agrawala, AOR For M/s. Equity Lex Associates, Advs. Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, AOR 8 State of Jharkhand Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Mohd. Waquas, Adv. Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Adv. State of Tamil Nadu Mr. B. Balaji, AOR Mr. Muthuvel, Adv. Mr. A. Arvind, Adv. Mr. T.N. Rama Rao, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. T. Veera Reddy, Adv. Ms. C.K. Sucharita, AOR State of Tamil Nadu Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Ms. Nithya, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR State of Haryana Mr. Alok Sangwan, AAG Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Adv. Ms. Anu Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Ravi Bharuka, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR State of Uttarakhand Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, AOR Uttarakhand Environment Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv. Pollution Control Board Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Ritesh Kumar, AOR Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR UT of Andaman & Mr. K. V. Jagdishvaran, Adv. Nicobar Admn. Ms. G. Indira, AOR State of Rajasthan Gp. Capt. Karan Singh Bhati, Adv. Ms. Mehul Singh, Adv. Mr. T. Gopal, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Kumar Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Amit Verma, Adv. Mr. Dilip Kumar Nayak, Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.R., AOR Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, AOR Ms. Shivani Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Chinmay, Adv. 9 Mr. Kaushik Poddar, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. N. Ganpathy, AOR Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR Ms. Praveena Gautam, AOR M/s. Karanjawala & Co. Mr. P. Parmeswaran, AOR Mr. Avijit Bhattacharjee, AOR CPCB Mr. Vijay Panjwani, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Surya Kant, AOR Odisha SPCB Mr. Ashok Kumar Panda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Tejaswi Kumar Pradhan, AOR Mr. Manoranjan Paikaray, Adv. State of Odisha Mr. Krishnayan Sen, AOR
Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, Adv. State of Arunachal Pradesh Mr. Anil Shrivastav, AOR State of Tripura Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adv. Ms. Varsha Poddar, Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohatgi, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR M/s Corporate Law Group, Advs. State of Gujarat Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR State of H.P. Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Sr. AAG Ms. Pragati Neekhra, AOR Govt. of Puducherry Mr. V.G. Pragasam, AOR Mr. S. Prabhu Ramasubramanian, Adv. Chhattisgarh Environment Ms. Purnima Bhat Kak, AOR Conservation Board 10 Ms. Sandhya Goswami, AOR State of Sikkim Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Yusuf Khan, Adv. Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv. for M/s Arputham Aruna & Co. Agra Nagar Nigam Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma, AOR Ms. Shalini Chandra, AOR State of Nagaland Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR Mr. Edward Belho, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. K. Luikang Michael, Adv. Mr. Z.H. Issac Haiding, Adv. Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, AOR Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR Mr. B.D. Sharma, AOR Ms. Meera Mathur, AOR Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR Mr. M.T. George, AOR Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma, AOR Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vivek Kohli, Adv. Mr. Nalin Talwar, Adv. Ms. Anubha Singh, Adv. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv. Ms. Sanjana Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Mathur, Adv. State of Maharashtra Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Ms. Madhavi Divan, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Khanna, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR 11 Mr. K.N. Bhat, Sr. Adv. Ms. Priyanjali Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, AOR State of Kerala Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Mr. Jishnu M.L., Adv. Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Adv. Ms. Beena Prakash, Adv. Mr. Manu Srinath, Adv. State of Manipur Mr. Sapam Bishwajit Meitei, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar Gaur, Adv.
Ms. Linthoingambi Thongam, Adv. Mr. M. Ghanshyam, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, AOR For Intervenor Mr. Rajiv Dhawan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Goswami, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR For Intervenor Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta II, AOR For Intervenor Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Vandana Anand, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Nair, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R These matters have been heard inter alia on 1.9.2016, 7.9.2016, 15.9.2016, 16.9.2016, 20.9.2016 and 21.9.2016. In the course of submissions by the learned counsel, it has been stated today that longer time will be required in completing the hearing as more submissions are to be made by many learned counsel representing the parties. Thus, it may not be possible to conclude the hearing so as to enable this Bench to decide the matter within the time available. In view of submission of the learned counsel for the parties and the learned Amicus Curiae, we direct that the matters be now listed for hearing on 9.11.2016 as first case. 12 At this stage, learned Amicus Curiae has invited the attention of the Court to the Order dated 3.4.2013 passed by this Court. The relevant part of the said order reads as follows: ⬠SMs. Indira Jaising, learned Additional Solicitor General invited the Court's attention to notifications issued by the Government of 23 States and the Administrators of 5 Union Territories for imposing complete ban on Gutkha and Pan Masala with tobacco and/or nicotine and then stated that notwithstanding the ban, the manufacturers have devised a subterfuge for selling Gutkha and Pan Masala in separate pouches and in this manner the ban is being flouted. Ms. Indira Jaising also placed before the Court xerox copy of D.O.No.P.16012/12/11-Part I dated 27.08.2012 sent by the Special Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India to the Chief Secretaries of all the States except the States of Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Bihar Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Haryana, Chhatisgarh and Jharkhand and submitted that the Court may call upon the remaining States and Union Territories to issue necessary notifications. In view of the statement made by the learned Additional Solicitor General, we order issue of notice to the Chief Secretaries of the States and the Administrators of the Union Territories which have so far not issued notification in terms of 2006 Act to apprise this court with the reasons as to why they have not taken action pursuant to letter dated 27.08.2012. We also direct the Secretaries, Health Department of all the 23 States and 5 Union Territories to file their affidavits within four weeks on the issue of total compliance of the ban imposed on manufacturing and sale of Gutkha and Pan Masala with tobacco and/or nicotine.⬠\235 Learned Amicus Curiae has also invited our attention to paragraph 21 of the Written Submissions on behalf of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, in S.L.P. (C) No. 16308 of 2007, which reads as follows:
⬠S 21. It is most respectfully submitted that to circumvent the ban on the sale of gutkha, the manufacturers are selling pan masala (without tobacco) with flavoured chewing tobacco in separate sachets but often conjoint and sold together by the same vendors from the same premises, so that consumers can buy the pan masala and flavoured chewing tobacco and mix them both and consume the same. Hence, instead of the earlier ⬠Sready to consume mixes⬠\235, chewing tobacco companies are selling gutkha in twin packs to be mixed as one⬠\235 Learned Amicus Curiae has also pointed out that this Court has not granted any stay of Regulation 2.3.4 of the Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition & Restrictions on Sales) Regulations, 2011 and the concerned authorities are duty bound to enforce the said regulation framed under Section 92 read with Section 26 of the Food Safety & Standards Act, 2006. In view of the above, the concerned statutory authorities are directed to comply with the above mandate of law. W e also direct the Secretaries, Health Department of all the States and
Union Territories to file their affidavits before the next date of hearing on the issue of total compliance of the ban imposed on manufacturing and sale of Gutkha and Pan Masala with tobacco and/or nicotine.
(S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER