Nahar Industrial Enterprises Limited vs. S. Kishore Alias Sethuraman Kishore

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:31 Oct 2022
CNR:SCIN010312652022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

31 Oct 2022

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.42+62 COURT NO.14 SECTION II-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

ITEM NO.42

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 31265/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-02-2022 in CRMM No. 4127/2022 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)

M/S NAHAR INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

S. KISHORE ALIAS SETHURAMAN KISHORE & ANR. Respondent(s)

( IA No.151694/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING )

ITEM NO.62

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 31270/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-02-2022 in CRMM No. 4120/2022 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)

M/S NAHAR INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

ALANKRITA SONI Respondent(s)

([ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 42 I.E. D. NO. 31265/2022. ] FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.155686/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING )

Date : 31-10-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Shankar M, Adv. Ms. Priya Singh, Adv. Mr. S. Priya Makkar, Adv. M/s. Apoorva Jha, Adv. Ms. Vidhi Thaker, Adv. M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Digitally signed by Nisha Khulbey Date: 2022.11.11 09:37:08 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay in both the matters are condoned.

Having heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner(s), we see no reason to interfere. However, in view of the concern expressed by the learned senior counsel that the matter is not being taken up before the High Court, liberty is reserved to the petitioner(s) to move the High Court for early consideration of the matter(s), which shall be taken note and an expeditious consideration be made.

Petitions are accordingly, disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(NISHA KHULBEY) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR