Rahul Aggarwal vs. The State Of Arunachal Pradesh State Of Arunachal Pradesh . Through Chief Secretary

ÄITEM NO.112 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31233/2010

RAHUL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report )

WITH SLP(C) NO. 34696 of 2010 (With office report)

Date: 05/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr A.K.Mishra, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr D Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr Rituraj Biswas, Adv. Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal ,Adv Mr G.B.Sewak, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma ,Adv Mr Manish Goswami, Adv. M/S Map & Co. ,Adv

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Considering the status of respondent No.8 in SLP(C) No. 31233/2010, list such SLP before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for appropriate orders so far as respondent No.8 is concerned. The ld. Advocate appearing for respondent Nos. 8 to 11 has pointed out that there is specific order with respect to respondent Nos. 14 to 21.

Registry has to verify such order as well as application concerning such respondents and to take appropriate steps in

consultation with the concerned Registrar (Judl.)

-2-

Item No.112

SLP(C) NO.34696/2010

Considering the fact that unserved respondent Nos. 4 to 6 are Government authorities, petitioner is permitted to confirm their service by additional dasti service which is permitted to be served through the Central Agency. So far as respondent Nos. 14 and 15 are concerned, petitioner has to confirm whether they want to serve them or not, since they have disclosed them as proforma respondents. For confirmation of service in this SLP, list again on 29.7.2011.

(S.G.SHAH) Registrar