Madhav Infra Projects Limited vs. M. P. Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List On (Date) [19-10-2022], List On NMD [ANY]
Listed On:
10 Oct 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.68
COURT NO.13
SECTION IV-C
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).17680-17682/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-09-2022 in IA No.9476/2022 and IA No.11694/2022 in WP No.12833/2022 passed by the High Court of M.P. Principal Seat at Jabalpur)
MADHAV INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED & ANR.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M. P. MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO.LIMITED & ORS. Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.146807/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.146806/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE No.146808/2022-PERMISSION TO IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ FTIF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date: 10-10-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Aryaman Sundaram, Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Sakya Singha Chaudhuri, AOR<br>Ms. Uttara Babbar, Adv.<br>Ms. Shreya Dubey, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhishek, Adv.<br>Mr. Ravish Kumar, Adv.<br>Ms. Shipra Jain, Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| For R.Nos.1 & 2 | For Respondent(s) Mr. Bharat Singh, AAG<br>Mr. Amit Pawan, AOR | |
| For State of M.P. Mr. Veer Vikrant Singh, DAG<br>Mr. Sunny Choudhary, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
Heard learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the 1. ature Not Verifi 🛻 🛻 itioners as also learned Additional Advocate General appearing 19:03:34 behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf $2.$ of respondent Nos.1 and 2 seeks and is granted one week's time to file counter affidavit with an advance copy to the counsel for the petitioners.
3. Meanwhile, the respondents shall consider the desirability of restoring the electricity supply to the petitioners for the limited purpose of pumping out water.
4. List these matters on 19.10.2022 (non-miscellaneous day).
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)