Dr. Santosh Kumar Mishra vs. Union Of India Secretary Human Resources Development
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
18 Apr 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
118249/2017,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REVISED Only for appearance ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33014- 33015/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-05-2017 in WA No. 30787/2016 18-05-2017 in WA No. 52518/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)
DR. SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s) IA No. 118249/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date : 18-04-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Pallav Sisodia, Sr. Adv.<br>Dr. Vinod K. Tewari, Adv.<br>Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, AOR<br>Mr. Sandeep Dwivedi, Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Nikhil Goel, Adv.<br>Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal, AOR<br>Mr. Wrick Chatterjee, Adv. | |
| Mr. Vatsal Joshi, Adv.<br>Mr. Sharath Narayan Nambiar, Adv.<br>Mr. Deepabal Datta, Adv.<br>Mr. Aniruddha Purushotham, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Gourab Banerji, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR<br>Mr. Subhro Mukherjee, Adv.<br>Mr. Rakesh Talukdar, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Learned counsel for the respondent rightly points out that the petitioner has really no right to be heard having not annexed the order of the High Court which
was adverse to him and further not even mentioning the order of this Court much less annexing it whereby by a speaking order the Special Leave Petition was dismissed.
The Special Leave Petitions are accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application stands disposed of.
(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33014- 33015/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-05-2017 in WA No. 30787/2016 18-05-2017 in WA No. 52518/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)
DR. SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s) IA No. 118249/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date : 18-04-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pallav Sisodia, Sr. Adv. Dr. Vinod K. Tewari, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Sandeep Dwivedi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nikhil Goel, Adv. Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal, AOR Mr. Wrick Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Vatsal Joshi, Adv. Mr. Sharath Narayan Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Deepabal Datta, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha Purushotham, Adv. Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR
- Mr. Subhro Mukherjee, Adv.
- Mr. Rakesh Talukdar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Learned counsel for the respondent rightly points out that the petitioner has really no right to be heard having not annexed the order of the High Court which was adverse to him and further not even mentioning the
order of this Court much less annexing it whereby by a speaking order the Special Leave Petition was dismissed.
The Special Leave Petitions are accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application stands disposed of.
(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)