Hindustan Education Society vs. Bharat
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Krishna Murari, Hon'ble S. Ravindra Bhat
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
25 Nov 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.17
COURT NO.13
SECTION IX
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 30700/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-05-2022 in WP No. 4869/2020 with WP No. 1574/2021 and 17-08-2022 in RA No. 172/2022 in RA No. 219/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad)
HINDUSTAN EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
BHARAT & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.165096/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.165097/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.165098/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $0.T.$ )
Date: 25-11-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Subodh S. Patil, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Delay condoned.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the materials placed on record, this Court is of the opinion that no interference is called for in the impugned order, particularly to the that the the fact that the University on 10.10.2010, had approved the appointment of the respondents, on permanent basis. In these circumstances, the petitioners-institution and university could not have taken a different stand to deny the respondents permanency.
The special leave petitions are, accordingly,dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SONIA BHASIN) (MATHEW ABRAHAM)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)