Girraj Bai vs. Lallu Lal

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19169/2023 GIRRAJ BAI Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

LALLU LAL & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

Date : 25-10-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.

<pre>For Petitioner(s)</pre>

Mr. Nitin Mishra, AOR Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, AOR Ms. Maitri Goal, Adv. Ms. Chavi Kalla, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent No.26.

Respondent Nos. 39 to 42 are granted four weeks' time as <pre>protection to the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the set of the s

$\tilde{\mathbb{I}}$ Respondent No. 21 has refused to accept the notice, as such, service is deemed to be complete, there is no appearance.

Notice issued to respondent no.24 has returned back with

the remarks 'unclaimed', as such, service shall be be deemed to be complete on said respondent in view of order passed by the Hon'ble Court in K. Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and Another, (1999) 7 Supreme Court Cases 510 and Registrar's Court's order dated 13.10.2023 passed in T.P. (C) No. 2090/2019, there is no appearance.

Service is complete on the remaining respondents but none has entered appearance.

List again on 25.2.2025.

SUJATA SINGH Registrar

MG