Madiraju Venkata Ramana Raju vs. Peddireddigari Ramachandra Reddy& Ors.

ITEM NO.37 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 9466-9468/2016 MADIRAJU VENKATA RAMANA RAJU Appellant(s) VERSUS PEDDIREDDIGARI RAMACHANDRA REDDY AND ORS. RES.NO.8 Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and office report) Date : 20/01/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr.Anand,Adv. Ms. Rajeshri Nivuratirao Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv. Mr.Sridhar Potaraju,Adv. Ms.Ankita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent No.8 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1,2,4,6 & 7, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, now, Mr.Sridhar Potaraju, Ld.counsel undertakes to appear for the respondent No.2. He seeks and is given one week's time to file the vakalatnama and four weeks time to file the counter affidavit. ⬠¦.....2 ITEM NO.37 -2- AC9466-9468/2016 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos.3 & 5 within a period of four weeks. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules after

expiry of five weeks subject to filing the proof of dasti. (M V RAMESH) Registrar

SB