Kiran Devi vs. Bhanwar Singh& Ors.

z ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.12 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).21211/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 25/05/2012 in DBCWP No.6591/2011 of the HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR) BIRLA CORPN.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHANWAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions, permission to file synopsis and list of dates and with prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 22377 of 2012 (With appln. for direction and with prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 23551 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 29698 of 2012 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 25186 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 26197 of 2012 (With appln. for direction and with prayer for interim relief and office report) Date:12/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish Salve,Sr.Adv. Mr. Mukul Rohatgi,Sr.Adv. Mr. Pravin H. Parekh,Sr.Adv. Mr. E.R. Kumar,Adv. Ms. Rukhmini Bobde,Adv. Mr. Galav Sharma,Adv. Mr. Vishal Prasad,Adv. for M/S. Parekh & Co.,Advs. Mr. S.K. Bagaria,Sr.Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. Ms. Sunaina Kumar,Adv. Mr. Abhishek,Adv. Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin,Adv. Mr. Salman Hashmi,Adv.

Mr. Giriraj Subramanium,Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,Adv. Mr. Amit Verma,Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar,Adv. Ms. Sanjoli Miittal,Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi,Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana,Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain,Adv. Mr. Annam D.N. Rao,Adv. Mrs. Neelam Jain,Adv. Ms. Mansha Monga,Adv. Mr. A. Venkatesh,Adv. Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee has submitted a Final Report on evaluation of cumulative effect of vibration induced by heavy earth moving machineries on the structural components of Chittorgarh Fort. The Archaeological Survey of India must respond thereto by filing an appropriate affidavit and stating therein as to what, in its view, would be the further study that is required to be done and within what time and by what method.

We are informed that Chittorgarh Fort is declared as "World Heritage" by UNESCO and the Archaeological Survey of India must say in its affidavit as to what are the protective arrangements made.

List these matters on 29th July, 2013, before a Bench of which one of us (H.L. Gokhale, J.) is not a member.

COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

(A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA)