State Of Haryana vs. Balwan Singh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Registrar
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Listed On:
22 Jan 2024
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. MAHESH TANAJIRAO PATANKAR
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13666- 13771/2023
MANAGING DIRECTOR HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
JAI SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)
(only slp no. 13666-771 of 2023 is to be listed before Ld. Registrar's Court. )
WITH
SLP(C) No. 969-971/2024 () (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.245973/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.245976/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.245978/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)
Date : 22-01-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh, Adv.
Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Ajay Marwah, AOR Mr. Swaroopananda Mishra, Adv. Mr. Karan Thakur, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Shukla, Adv. Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv. Mrs. Leelawati Suman, Adv. Mrs. Barnali Basak, Adv. Mr. Syed Miran Ahmad, Adv.
Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR
Mr. Siddharth Nath, Adv. Mr. Amit Agrawal, AOR
MAHESH TANAJIRAO PATANKAR Digitally signed by MAHESH TANAJIRAO PATANKAR Date: 2024.01.22 22:34:21 +0530
Ms. Khushboo Hora, Adv. Mr. Anunay Chowdhary, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) Nos.13666-771/2023
Ms. Sabarni Som, Ld. Counsel appearing for Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, Ld. AOR submits that there is change in counsel for the petitioner and seeks time, to file vakalatnama. One week time, is granted to file the vakalatnama.
Ld. Counsel appearing for respondent nos.2 and 108 (Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.) submits that vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of said respondents and does not wish to file counter affidavit.
Appearing respondents are at liberty to file counter affidavit, if not already filed.
However, office report is not clear. List again on 01.02.2024 with detailed office report.
MAHESH TANAJIRAO PATANKAR Registrar
pm