State Of Haryana vs. Balwan Singh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2
SECTION IV-B
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VIVEK SAXENA
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 13666-13771/2023
MANAGING DIRECTOR HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
JAI SINGH & ORS.
Respondent(s)
(only slp no. 13666-771 of 2023 is to be listed before Ld. Registrar's Court. )
Date: 21-11-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv. Mrs. Barnali Basak, Adv. Mr. N D Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR
Ms. Khushboo Hora, Adv. Mr. Amit Agrawal, AOR
Mr. Suryadeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Despite due service on respondent nos.3 and 4, there is no appearance.
Signature Mot Verified Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, Tyr taking appropriate steps for effecing service on all the unserved respondents.
ITEM NO.27
Ld. Counsel appearing for respondent nos.8 to 13 submits that they representing several other respondents and some of whom have expired and further submits that he would be filing the details of the deceased respondents and their respective LR's to the petitioner within two weeks.
Thereafter, two weeks time, is granted to petitioner to file appropriate application in this regard.
Ld. Counsel appearing for the respondent-Maruti Suzuki (R. No.126) submits that there is discrepancy in respect of respondent number in the cause list and in the notice served on them. Let office to verify and rectify the discrepancy if any.
List again on 22.01.2024.
VIVEK SAXENA Registrar
pm