State Of Haryana vs. Balwan Singh

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh, Aravind Kumar
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:20 Sept 2023
CNR:SCIN010301962023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VIVEK SAXENA

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13666- 13771/2023

MANAGING DIRECTOR HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

JAI SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.81237/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS )

WITH

Reason:

SLP(C) No. 13778/2023 (IV-B)

([TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 10 I.E. Diary No.

20759/2022]............ IA No.120646/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

SLP(C) No. 14149/2023 (IV-B)

( IA No.119693/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.119695/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.119696/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.119694/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.119699/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

SLP(C) No. 13775-13777/2023 (IV-B)

( IA No.75538/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.75536/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.75543/2023-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.75540/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.75545/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. and IA No.75546/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)

SLP(C) No. 13774/2023 (IV-B)

( IA No.111439/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Date : 20-09-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today. Digitally signed by MADHU GROVER Date: 2023.09.21 12:56:29 IST Signature Not Verified

For Petitioner(s)Mr. Raj Kumar Prashar,Adv.
Mr. Nishesh Sharma, AOR
Mr. Ravi Lanod,Adv.

Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, AOR Mr. Nabab Singh,Av. Ms. Geetanjali Das Krishnan,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR Mr. Vijay Pal,Adv. Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Umang Gripathi,Adv. Mr. Kailash Prashad Pandey, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Khushboo Hora,Adv. Mr. Anunay Chowdhary,Adv. Mr. Amit Agarwal,AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 13666-13771/2023

Despite service of notice on respondent Nos. 2 to 4, there is no appearance on their behalf.

Await the return of the service of notice already issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 5 to 125 and 127 to 472.

Ms. Khushboo Hora, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr. Amit Agarwal, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for respondent No.126.

She seeks and is given four weeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit.

List again on 21.11.2023.

SLP(C) No. 13778/2023

Despite service of notice on respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5, there is no appearance on their behalf.

However Ms. Khushboo Hora, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr. Amit Agarwal, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for respondent No.5.

She seeks and is given four weeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit.

Notice issued to respondent No.4 is returned with postal remarks "Refused". Thus, service is deemed to be complete on the respondent and there is no appearance.

After expiry of the said period, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

SLP(C) No. 14149/2023

Despite service of notice on respondent Nos.1 to 3, there is no appearance on their behalf. Hence, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

SLP(C) No. 13775-13777/2023

Despite service of notice on respondent No. 2, there is no appearance on their behalf.

Notice issued to respondent No.1 is returned with postal remarks "Refused". Thus, service is deemed to be complete on the respondent and there is no appearance.

Hence, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

SLP(C) No.13774/2023

Despite service of notice on respondent Nos. 2 to 5, there is no appearance on their behalf.

Notice issued to respondent No.1 is returned with postal remarks "Refused". Thus, service is deemed to be complete on the respondent and there is no appearance.

Hence, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

VIVEK SAXENA Registrar

MG

3

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(17) - 10 Feb 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 21 Jan 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 4 Oct 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 20 Aug 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 1 Aug 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 10 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 15 Apr 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 18 Mar 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 1 Feb 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 22 Jan 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 4 Jan 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 21 Nov 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 20 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(3) - 17 Jul 2023

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 17 Jul 2023

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 5 Jul 2023

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 4 Jul 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view