Natubhai Lakhubhai Solanki vs. Dashrathbhai Punjabhai Patel
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble R.V. Raveendran
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:25 Oct 2010
CNR:SCIN010301782010
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
29 Sept 2010
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| È | 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITEM NO.21 | COURT NO.3 | SECTION IX | |||
| S U P R E M E | C O U R T | O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | ||
| Petition(s)<br>28068/2010 | for<br>Special | Leave | to<br>Appeal | (Civil) | No(s).28067- |
| (From the judgement and order dated 05/08/2010 in<br>AFO No.<br>213/2010 & CA No. 7490/2010<br>of The HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT<br>AHMEDABAD) | |||||
| NATUBHAI LAKHUBHAI SOLANKI | Petitioner(s) | ||||
| VERSUS | |||||
| DASHRATHBHAI PUNJABHAI PATEL AND ORS. | Respondent(s) | ||||
| interim relief) | (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for | ||||
| Date: 25/10/2010<br>today. | These Petitions were called on for hearing | ||||
| CORAM : | HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK | ||||
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. L.N. Rao,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi,Adv.<br>Mr. Pradhuman Gohil,Adv.<br>Mr. Vikas Singh,Adv.<br>Mr. S. Hari Haran,Adv.<br>Mrs. Taruna Singh,adv.<br>Ms. Charu Mathur,Adv. | ||||
| For Respondent(s) | Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr. | Umesh shukla,Adv.<br>Mahesh Agarwal,Adv.<br>Rishi Agarwal,Adv.<br>E.C. Agrawala,Adv.<br>Nakul Mohta,Adv. | C.A. Sundraram,Sr.Adv. | ||
| Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Ms.<br>Mr. | Mukund Chokshy,Adv.<br>Ruchi Kohli,Adv.<br>Abhijat P. Medh ,Adv | Mukul Rohtagi,Sr.Adv. | |||
| UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following | O R D E R<br>2 | ||||
| On the facts and circumstances, we find | |||||
| no<br>reason | to<br>interfere, | as | the | discretion | |
| exercised by the trial court to refuse interim |
injunction has been affirmed by the High Court
and the petitioner has the benefit of doctrine
of lis pendens. The Special Leave Petition is
therefore, dismissed.
We, however, request the trial court to dispose of the suit expeditiously and it is needless to say that the trial court would do so uninfluenced by any observation made by the High Court in the impugned order.
(O.P. Sharma) (M.S. Negi) Court Master Court Master
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search