Anas Enterprises vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY
TRANSFER CASE (CIVIL.) NO. 20 OF 2010
M/S DHARAMPAL SATYAPAL LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
U.O.I & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for amendment of the petition,stay and office report )
WITH T.C.(C) NO. 1 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 16445 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) T.C.(C) NO. 2 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 2014 of 2009 (With prayer for interim relief) T.C.(C) NO. 22 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief) T.C.(C) NO. 23-24 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief) T.C.(C) NO. 3 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief) T.C.(C) NO. 34 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief) T.C.(C) NO. 4 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief) T.C.(C) NO. 5 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief) T.P.(C) NO. 9-28 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief) Date: 10/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Bishwajeet Dubey, Adv. M/S Suresh A. Shroff & Co.,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Ms. Bina Gupta,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. M/S. "Coac",Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Bina Gupta,Adv. Mr Mohd. Mannan, ADv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr. Atulesh Kumar,Adv. -2- Item No.17 UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner in TC(C) No. 22 and
34 of 2010 is present.
The ld. Counsel for the respondent-Union of India in all these petitions is present.
TC(C) NO.1/2011
The ld. Counsel, Mr S.N.Terdal, to file paper books as per office report within three weeks from today. TP(C) NO.9/2011
The ld. Counsel despite the request of the registry vide its letter dated 9.4.2011 has not furnished the correct and current address of the unserved respondent No.1 and has not done the needful.
TP(C) NO.11/2011
As per office report, the ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not furnished the correct and current address of the unserved respondent No.3 despite registry's letter dated 4.4.2011.
TP(C) NO.13/2011
Service against the respondent is complete but nobody has entered appearance on his behalf.
TP(C) NO.15/2011
Service against respondent No.1 is complete but nobody has entered appearance on his behalf. TP(C) NO.16/2011
Service against respondent No.2 is complete but nobody has entered appearance on his behalf.
-3-
Item No.17
TP(C) NO.17,18 OF 2011
Service against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is complete but nobody has entered appearance on their behalf. TP(C) NO.19-25,27 AND 28 OF 2011
The ld. Counsel, Mr Wasim A Qadri shall be directed to file the vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of the respondents.
TC(C) NO.20/2010
The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present and submits that he has filed an application seeking amendment of the petition. Office to verify the same and submit. SLP(C) NO.16445/2010
Service is complete.
Counter affidavit has been filed.
SLP(C) NO.2014/2009
Three weeks' time is granted to the ld. Counsel for the respondent to file counter affidavit.
The above matters also include matters of the year 2008, hence registry is directed to send reminder to the concerned High Court through fax for certificate of service and regarding transmission of original records forthwith in respect of unserved petitioners/respondents.
List again on 30.9.2011.
(H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRAR
hj