Chandrappa vs. Davanagere City Municipal Corp. Davanager
AI Summary
In a decisive move, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Special Leave Petition (Civil) filed by Chandrappa and others, upholding a Karnataka High Court order. This procedural dismissal, rendered after hearing the petitioners, signifies the apex court's decision not to intervene in the matter, bringing finality to the legal challenge.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
Chandrappa & Ors. filed a Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 34494/2012 before the Supreme Court of India, challenging the judgment and order dated 03/07/2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in WP No.35352/2010 (GM-CPC). The petition was heard on 26/11/2012 and subsequently dismissed.
Timeline of Events
Writ Petition No.35352/2010 (GM-CPC) filed in the High Court of Karnataka.
Judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka in WP No.35352/2010.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.34494/2012 registered in the Supreme Court.
Special Leave Petition heard and dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Key Factual Findings
The petition for special leave lacks merit.
Source: Current Court Finding
Primary Legal Issues
Statutes Applied
Petitioner's Arguments
The petitioners, through their counsel, argued that the impugned order of the High Court of Karnataka warranted interference by the Supreme Court, likely on grounds of material irregularity, legal error, or substantial injustice, seeking special leave to appeal.
Court's Reasoning
The Supreme Court, after hearing the counsel for the petitioners, found no merit in the Special Leave Petition. This implies that the grounds presented were insufficient to convince the Court to exercise its discretionary power under Article 136 of the Constitution and admit the petition for a full hearing.
- Strict Adherence to Jurisdictional Limits
- Emphasis on Discretionary Power
Impugned Orders
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
A summary dismissal of a Special Leave Petition at the admission stage without detailed reasoning generally does not constitute a binding precedent on the merits of the case, as it only signifies the Supreme Court's disinclination to entertain the appeal.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
5 Nov 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
\200
ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).34494/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 03/07/2012 in WP No.35352/2010 (GM-CPC) of The HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE) CHANDRAPPA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DAVANAGERE CITY MUNICIPAL CORP.DAVANAGER Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report ) Date: 26/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI For Petitioner(s) Mr. L.K. Sharma, Adv. For Mr. B. Subrahmanya Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard counsel for the petitioners. We find no merit in this petition for special leave. It is dismissed. |(Neetu Khajuria) |(Sneh Bala Mehra) |
|Sr.P.A. |Court Master |