Food Corporation Of India vs. Kurali Laxmi Milling Coop. Industrial Society Ltd
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
27 Jul 2010
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Item $No.9$
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR
Civil Appeal No(s). 2661-2662/2017
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
$Appellant(s)$
VERSUS
THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (main matter is CA Nos.2661-2662/2017 and service is complete in the instant matter. The matter is therefore put up to be listed before the Ld. Registrar)
WITH
- C.A. No. $2663/2017$ (IV)
- C.A. No. $2664/2017$ (IV)
- C.A. No. $2678/2017$ (IV)
- C.A. No. $2667/2017$ (IV)
- C.A. No. 2668-2677/2017 (IV)
- C.A. No. $2680/2017$ (IV)
- C.A. No. 2679/2017 (IV)
- C.A. No. $2681/2017$ (IV)
- W.P. (C) No. $153/2011$ (X)
- W.P. (C) No. $389/2011$ (X)
- C.A. No. $2682/2017$ (IV)
- C.A. No. 2683/2017 (IV)
- C.A. No. $2684/2017$ (IV)
- <pre>program to the second program to the second program to the second program to the second program to the second program to the second program to the second program to the second program to the second program to the seco
For Appellant(s) Mr. Y. Prabhakara Rao, AOR Mr. P. N. Puri, AOR
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. R. Chandrachud, AOR Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, AOR
Mr. Rajesh Sharma,Adv. Ms. Shalu Sharma, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. S. S. Jauhar, AOR Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, AOR Mr. Kuldip Singh, AOR
Ms.Ranjeet Rohtagi,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. Nos. 2661-2662,2663,2664,2678, 2667, 2668-2677,2680,2679, 2681 2682,2683 and 2684//2017
Service is complete. Ld. Counsel for the parties have failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period.
W.P.(C) No. 153/2011
The office report indicates that all the respondents have already filed the counter affidavit.
W.P.(C) No. 389/2011
The office report further states that service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1 and 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.
At this stage, It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of State of Punjab that Standing Counsel for the State of Punjab has been changed. Ms. Ranjeet Rohtagi, Ld. Counsel seeks and is given four weeks time to file fresh memo of appearance. After expiry of four weeks, list all the matters before the Hon'ble Court.
SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar
MG