Saranga Krishna Murthy vs. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna, Hon'ble Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
28 Sept 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.16
COURT NO.15
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.16935/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30-08-2022 in WA No. 397/2022 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad)
SARANGA KRISHNA MURTHY
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.142881/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING <pre>C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )</pre>
Date: 28-09-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. B.Shravanth Shanker, AOR<br>Ms. Prerna Robin, Adv.<br>Mr. B. Yeshwanth Raj, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Ms. Pratibha Yadav, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhishek Chandra Mishra, AOR |
| For R.No.10 | Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv.<br>Mr. Rohit Dutta, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and perused the petition papers.
Though the respondent has entered on caveat, we see Positions need to call upon the respondents to respond as we are not $\begin{array}{c}\n\text{202--03} \ 19:08:11 \quad \text{IS} \ \text{19:08:11} \quad \text{IS} \ \text{19:08:11} \quad \text{IS} \ \text{19:08:11} \quad \text{IS} \ \text{19:08:11} \quad \text{IS} \ \text{19:08:11} \quad \text{IS} \ \text{19:08:11} \quad \text{IS} \ \text{19:08:11} \quad \text{IS} \ \text{19:08:11} \quad \text{IS} \ \text{19:08:11} \quad \text{IS} \ \text{19$ inclined to interfere with the order passed by the High Court.
SLP(C) No.16935/2022
At this stage, learned senior counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a tenant in the said building and also he has entered into an agreement to purchase the property.
In that regard, we express no opinion except to say that the petitioner may avail his remedies in that regard in accordance with law. Insofar as an appeal stated to be pending before the High Court regarding specific performance, the petitioner may file an appropriate application before the High Court seeking early hearing and the High Court may consider the same keeping in view its Board, if it is possible to be taken up at an early date.
With the above observations, the Special Leave Petition stands disposed of.
Pending applications shall also stand disposed of.
(RAJNI MUKHI) (DIPTI KHURANA) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR