The State Of Gujarat vs. Mohmmad Ansar Kutbuddin Ansari
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Arun Mishra, Hon'ble M.R. Shah
Stage:
Criminal Matters : Criminal matters in which sentence awarded is life imprisonment
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [6]
Listed On:
12 May 2019
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
121613/2018,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.1 SECTION II-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Criminal Appeal No(s).517/2018
ABDUL RAHEMAN DHANTIYA @ KANKATTO @ JAMBURO Appellant(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s)
([ONLY I.A. NOS. 109376 OF 2023 (APPLICATION FOR BAIL ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT NO. 8 NAMELY SAUKAT YUSUF ISMAIL MOHAN), 143069/2023(INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION) AND 143233/2023(Application on Behalf of Appellant No. 12 - Bilal Abdullah Ismail Badam Ghanchi for Grant of Bail IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 522-526 OF 2018 ARE LISTED)
WITH
Crl.A. No. 522-526/2018 (II-B) (IA No. 109376/2023 - GRANT OF BAIL, IA No. 143233/2023 - INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION, IA No. 143069/2023 - INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION)
Date : 14-08-2023 These applications were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr. Adv. Mr. Salim A. Inamdar, Adv. Mr. Modassir Hushain Khan, Adv. Ms. Shruti Kapur, Adv. Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR
Ms. Qurratulain, AOR
For Respondent(s) | Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General |
---|---|
Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. | |
Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR | |
Ms. Devyani Bhatt, Adv. | |
Ms. Srishti Mishra, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
IA No. 109376/2023, 143069/2023 and IA No. 143233/2023
- 1 The applications for bail are by Appellant No 8 (Saukat Yusuf Ismail Mohan @ Bibino), Appellant No 10 (Siddik @ Matunga Abdullah Badam-Shaikh) and Appellant No 12 (Bilal Abdullah Ismail Badam Ghanchi).
- 2 Having regard to the specific role which is attributed to the appellants, we are not inclined to enlarge Appellant Nos 8, 10 and 12 on bail. These observations will not come in the way of the disposal of the appeal on merits.
- 3 The applications for bail are accordingly dismissed.
(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) DEPUTY REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR