Rajat Jain vs. Mahatma Gandhi Medical College And Hospital And Ors. Principal Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
MATTER FOR : 27.04.2015 COURT NO. 3 ITEM NO. 11
SECTION-XV
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 25411/14, 24189-190/14, 24181-182/14, 9346/15, 9457/15, 9506/15 and 8769-70 OF 2015 WITH
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4 (In SLP NO. 9457/15) (Application for directions and deleting the name of respondent) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4 (In SLP NO. 9506/15) (Application for directions and deleting the name of respondent)
WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
RAJAT JAIN ...PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
MAHATMA GANDHI MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S)
OFFICE REPORT
S.L.P. (C) NO. 25411/2014
The matter above-mentioned was mentioned and taken on board on 07.04.2014, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:
"At the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, list on 28th April, 2015."
S.L.P. (C) NO. 24181-182/2014
It is submitted that there are nine respondents in these matters. Respondent No. 1 is common in both the matters. Mr. P. K. Jain, Advocate has filed vakalatnama & memo of appearance and Counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 1. Copy of the same has already been included in the paper books. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocate has filed vakalatnama & memo of appearanceon behalf of Respondent No. 2 & 8 but counter affidavit awaited. Mr. Praveen Swarup, Advocate has filed vakalatnama & memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 3 but counter affidavit awaited. Ms. Pratibha Jain, Advocate has filed vakalatnama & memo of appearanceon behalf of Respondent No. 4 and 7 without affixing stamp of Dental College and Hospital but counter affidavit awaited.
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. 5 and 9 ( Medical Council of India) but counter affidavit awaited. Counsel for the petitioner has on 12.09.2014 filed affidavit of dasti service in respect of Respondent No. 6 but no one has entered appearance on behalf of him so far.
Service is complete in both the matters.
S.L.P. (C) NO. 24189-24190/2014
It is submitted that there are five respondents in these matters. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocate has filed vakalatnama & memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2 and 5 but counter affidavit awaited. Counsel for the petitioner has on 12.09.2014 filed affidavit of dasti service in respect of Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 but no one has entered appearance on behalf of them so far.
Service is complete.
S.L.P. (C) NO. 8769-70/2015, 9346, 9457 & 9506 of 2015
The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.03.2015 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:
"Issue notice returnable on 27.04.2015. Tag with SLP (C) Nos. 24181-24182 of 2014. In the meanwhile, the contempt proceedings, if any, shall not proceed further. Dasti, in addition."
S.L.P. (C) NO. 9346/2015
It is submitted that there are twenty-four respondents in the matter. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No. 5 but has not filed counter affidavit. The Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service with proof after effecting service on respondent No. 1 to 13, 18 & 22. It is also stated in affidavit that respondent Nos. 14 to 17, 19 to 21, 23 and 24 have refused to receive the notice and notice was sent by way of speed post.
S.L.P. (C) NO. 9457/2015
It is submitted that there are twenty-two respondents in the matter. The Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service with proof after effecting service on respondent Nos. 1 to 12. It is also stated in affidavit that respondent Nos. 13 has refused to receive the notice. He has filed an application for deleting the name of respondent Nos. 14 to 22 which is registered as I. A. No. 4. Copy of the same is being circulated herewith.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has filed application for directions which is registered as I. A. No. 3. Copy of the same is being circulated herewith.
S.L.P. (C) NO. 9506/2015
It is submitted that there are ninteen respondents in the matter. The Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service with proof after effecting service on respondent Nos. 1 to 12. It is also stated in affidavit that respondent Nos. 13 has refused to receive the notice. He has filed an application for deleting the name of respondent Nos. 14 to 19 which is registered as I. A. No. 4. Copy of the same is being circulated herewith.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has filed application for directions which is registered as I. A. No. 3. Copy of the same is being circulated herewith.
S.L.P. (C) NO. 8769-70/2015
It is submitted that there are ten respondents (Common in both the SLPs). Mr. P. K. Jain, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of Dr. Yogendra Singh Gurjar but has not filed counter affidavit. Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service in respect of all the respondents but he has not filed proof of dasti service in respect of respondent No. 6 (UGC).
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 24.04.2015 filed application for permission to file additional documents alongwith document-I. Copy of the same is being circulated herewith.
The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.
Dated this the 25th day of April, 2015.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to : Ms. Arti Gupta, Adv. Mr. P. K. Jain, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv.