eCourtsIndia

Brij Kishore(Dead) Through Lrs vs. Sumer Chand

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Dismissed
Order Date:25 Sept 2014
CNR:SCIN010298562007

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

6 Dec 2010

Order Text

SECTION-IV

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10430 OF 2010

Brij Kishore (Dead) Thr. Lrs. ...Appellants

Versus

Sumer Chand & Ors. ...Respondents

OFFICE REPORT ON PRE-FINAL HEARING

The Office Report is prepared as per Circular No.F.41/Judl./2008 dated 17th December, 2008:-

  • (a) There are Respondents Nos.1 to 5, 6 (i) to 6 (viii), 7 to 13, 14 (i) to (iv), 15 & 16. Respondents No.1 & 2(i) are represented through Mr. Atishi Dipankar & Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 5, 6 (i) & 6 (iv) are deleted vide Court's order dated 10.8.2008. Respondent No.6 (ii), 6(iii), 6(v) to 6(viii), 7 to 13, 14(i) to 14(iv), 15 & 16 have been served with Notice at SLP stage but have not chosen to enter appearance.
  • (b) Original Record has been received from the High Court & is available in this Registry for reference of the Hon'ble Court.
  • (c) Not applicable.
  • (d) Not applicable.
  • (e) No application for substitution is pending.
  • (f) Counsel for Appellant has on 17.8.2012 filed Statement of Case. Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 has on 01.07.2014 filed Statement of Case along with Application for condonation of delay in filing Statement of Case.
  • (g) Not applicable.

Dated this the 9th day of September, 2014.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to:-

    1. Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate.
    1. Ms. Atishi Dipankar, Advocate.
    1. Mr. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, Advocate

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(30) - 2 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 31 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 31 Mar 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 31 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 25 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 25 Sept 2014

Office Report - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(26) - 25 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 6 Dec 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 16 Nov 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 26 Oct 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 27 Aug 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 13 May 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 19 Apr 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 9 Apr 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 8 Mar 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 21 Jan 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 25 Feb 2009

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 22 Jan 2009

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 22 Jan 2009

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 22 Jan 2009

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 4 Dec 2008

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 26 Nov 2008

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 18 Sept 2008

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 5 Sept 2008

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 29 Jul 2008

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 15 Jul 2008

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 7 May 2008

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 25 Mar 2008

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 11 Feb 2008

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 7 Dec 2007

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties