A. Jayachandra Reddy vs. State Bank Of Bikaner-Jaipur

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sandeep Mehta
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:9 Sept 2024
CNR:SCIN010298492024

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

9 Sept 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.40

COURT NO.14

SECTION XII-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 29887/2024

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-06-2024 in WP No. 28425/2018 passed by the High Court For The State Of Telangana At Hyderabad)

G ANANTHSENA REDDY & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AUTHORISED OFFICER & ORS. Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.183398/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS; IA No. 183398/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)

WITH Diary No(s). 29849/2024 (XII-A) (IA No. 191294/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)

Diary No(s). 29873/2024 (XII-A) (IA No. 195972/2024 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 195963/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS; IA No. 195974/2024 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT)

Date: 09-09-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Mr. Botla Venkateswara Rao, Adv. Ms. Filza Moonis, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Singh, AOR

Ms. Khyati Jain, Adv. nature Not Verified Ms. Ashura Arshi, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$

1. Delay condoned. 2. Heard Mr. Jayant Bhushan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners.

3. While we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and orders passed by the High Court, Mr. Jayant Bhushan, learned Senior Counsel seeks to avail an alternative remedy as suggested by the High Court. In that event, we would request the Appellate Tribunal to disposed of the petition as expeditiously as possible.

4. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed accordingly.

5. Pending applications, including substitution & its accompanying applications shall stand disposed of.

(INDU MARWAH) (NIDHI WASON) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)