The State Of Maharashtra Municipal Coproration Of Greater Mumbai vs. Satish Prakash Rohra

ô ITEM NO.58 COURT NO.10 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30524/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/06/2013 in WP No. 2535/2008 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) MUNICIPAL CORP. OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS HIRAMAN SITARAM DEORUKHAR AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp) Date : 12/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Jayashree Wad, Adv. Mr. Ashish Wad, Adv. Mrs. Kanika Baweja, Adv. Mr. Sangram Singh Bhonsle, Adv. Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Adv. M/s. J. S. Wad & Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, Adv. Mr. Brij Kishor Sah, Adv. Mr. Anish R. shah, Adv. M/s. S.M. Jadhav & Company,Adv. For RR. No. 14 Mr. Vadrevu V. Pattabhiram, Adv. Mr. Nishant R. Katneswarkar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed by the learned Counsel for Respondent No. 14, four weeks' time is granted to file response. Rejoinder thereto shall be filed within two weeks' Signature Not Verified hence. Digitally signed by Usha Rani Bhardwaj Date: 2015.10.13 List thereafter. 16:37:28 IST Reason: (NEELAM GULATI) (INDU POKHRIYAL)

COURT MASTER COURT MASTER