Sachchidanand Gupta vs. State Of U. P. Through Pricipal Secretary

¨1 ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26351/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/08/2016 in WP No. 5283/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) SACHCHIDANAND GUPTA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file lengthy list of dates and interim relief and office report) I.A. No(s).3 7 4 ⬠(Appln(s) for Directions and permission to file additional documents) Date : 16/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Mehrotra,Adv. Mr. Talaha A. Raheman,Adv. Mr. Nadeema Murtaza,Adv. Mr. Mohd. Talha,Adv. Ms. Shumaila Altaf,Adv. Mr. Jatinder Singh,dv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Singh,Sr.Adv. (RR-8) Mr. Gaurav Jain,Adv. M s. Abha Jain,Adv. Mr. Anupam Mishra,Adv. Mr. Neeraj Jain,Adv. Mr. Jaivir Singh,Adv. (RR-4) Mr. Rajeev Dubey,Adv. Mr. Manoj K. Mishra,Adv. Mr. Kamlendra Mishra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Issue notice, returnable within six weeks. 2 Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel, who appears on behalf of respondent no.8 and Mr. Manoj K. Mishra, Advocate, who appears on behalf of respondent no.4 accept notice. Notice shall issue to the remaining respondents. Dasti, in addition, is also permitted. Pending further orders from this Court while the respondents shall be free to use the sugar mills purchased by them as sugar mills and make them functional, if they have gone out of production, they shall not either transfer or otherwise encumber the same without the permission of the Court. Post along with Civil Appeal No.4766 of 2010. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER