Sachchidanand Gupta vs. State Of U. P. Through Pricipal Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
6 Sept 2016
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
TTEM NO. $29$
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). $26351/2016$
COURT NO.1
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/08/2016 in WP No. 5283/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)
SACHCHIDANAND GUPTA
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to <pre>file lengthy list of dates and interim relief and office report)</pre> I.A. No(s).3 7 4 - (Appln(s) for Directions and permission to file <pre>additional documents)</pre>
Date: 16/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.
$CORAM :$
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
| For Petitioner(s) | Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Gaurav Mehrotra, Adv. | |
| Mr. Talaha A. Raheman, Adv. | |
| Mr. Nadeema Murtaza, Adv. | |
| Mr. Mohd. Talha, Adv. | |
| Ms. Shumaila Altaf, Adv. | |
| Mr. Jatinder Singh, dv. | |
| $(RR-8)$ | For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. |
| Mr. Gaurav Jain, Adv. | |
| Ms. Abha Jain, Adv. | |
| Mr. Anupam Mishra, Adv. | |
| Mr. Neeraj Jain, Adv. | |
| Mr. Jaivir Singh, Adv. | |
| $(RR-4)$ | Mr. Rajeev Dubey, Adv. |
| Mr. Manoj K. Mishra, Adv. | |
| Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, Adv. | |
| Signature Not Verified | |
| Digitally signed by<br>MAHABIR SMGH | UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following |
| Reason: | ORDER |
Heard.
Issue notice, returnable within six weeks.
SECTION XT
Respondent(s)
Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel, who appears on behalf of respondent no.8 and Mr. Manoj K. Mishra, Advocate, who appears on behalf of respondent no.4 accept notice. Notice shall issue to the remaining respondents.
Dasti, in addition, is also permitted.
Pending further orders from this Court while the respondents shall be free to use the sugar mills purchased by them as sugar mills and make them functional, if they have gone out of production, they shall not either transfer or otherwise encumber the same without the permission of the Court.
Post along with Civil Appeal No.4766 of 2010.
(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER