The State Of Maharashtra Home Department Secretary vs. Pintya @ Bhausaheb Sampat Bavale
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Administrative Order
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [4], List before court/bench
Listed On:
8 Jan 2019
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2
SECTION II-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SURINDER S. RATHI
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2044-2047/2016
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)
VERSUS
PINTYA @ BHAUSAHEB SAMPAT BAVALE
WITH SLP(Crl) No. 2168-2171/2016 (II-A)
Date: 01-08-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. K. N. Rai, AOR Mr. Subash Chandran, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR
For Respondent(s)
- Ms. Nidhi, AOR
- Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR
- Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv.
Mr. Anand Mishra, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0$ R D F R
SLP(Crl) No. 2044-2047/2016
Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks' time, to file the counter affidavit.
Service is deemed complete in respect of Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 as per Order dated 09.11.2017.
After the expiry of four weeks, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
ignature Not Verified P(Crl) No. 2168-2171/2016
The respondent No. 5 has failed to file the counter affidavit despite given opportunities.
Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 are granted four weeks' time, to file the counter affidavit.
Service of notice is complete on Respondent No. 2 but no one has chosen to enter appearance on his behalf.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of respondent No. 3 within two weeks.
List again on 02.12.2019
SURINDER S. RATHI Registrar
pm