Pramod Kumar Sharma (D) Thr. Lrs.& Ors. vs. State Of Haryana And Ors. Thr. Land Acquisition Collector

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble M.R. Shah
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:16 Apr 2014
CNR:SCIN010296632011

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

2 Dec 2011

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).34043/2011 PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA(D) TR.LRS.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report ) WITH SLP(C) NO. 3403 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 16/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi,Adv. Mr Govind Narayan, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Manjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr Shubham Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv. Mr Abhinav Jain, Adv. Dr Monika Gusain, Adv. Mr Anupam Dhingra, Adv. Mr Pramod B Aggarwal, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.34043/2011 Matter falls under complete category. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when other connected matter would become ready. -2- Item No.11 SLP(C) NO.3403/2012 As reflected from the office report on 31.3.2014, the matter was listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers when His Lordship was pleased to pass the following directions

" Perused the Office Report on Default. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, one week's time is granted for filing the application for setting aside abatement."

As per the above noted direction, the ld. Counsel for the petitioner was supposed to move an application for setting aside abatement in respect of respondent No.4 but it seems that instead only an application for condonation of delay has been filed. The ld. counsel for the petitioner to rectify the omission within two weeks and on compliance applications be processed as per rules. In the event of default matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary orders/directions.

So far as remaining respondents are concerned, service is complete and duly represented respondents have already filed counter affidavit on record.

List again on 9.5.2014.

(M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRAR

hj

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(62) - 29 Nov 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(61) - 1 Nov 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(60) - 22 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(59) - 9 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(58) - 16 Jul 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(57) - 9 Apr 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(56) - 11 Mar 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(55) - 25 Jan 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(54) - 6 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(53) - 1 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(52) - 13 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(49) - 21 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(50) - 21 Apr 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(51) - 21 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(46) - 23 Mar 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(47) - 23 Mar 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(48) - 23 Mar 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(43) - 9 Dec 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(44) - 9 Dec 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(45) - 9 Dec 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(40) - 7 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(41) - 7 Oct 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(42) - 7 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 24 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 24 Aug 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 24 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(34) - 18 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(35) - 18 Jul 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 18 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 4 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 4 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 9 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 9 May 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 9 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 25 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 25 Feb 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 25 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 9 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 9 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 23 Sept 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(22) - 23 Sept 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(23) - 23 Sept 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 9 Sept 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 9 Sept 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 9 Sept 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 11 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 11 Dec 2014

Office Report

Click to view

Order(17) - 11 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 9 May 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 16 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(12) - 18 Feb 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 13 Jan 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 7 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 29 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 25 Oct 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 13 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 21 Jan 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 2 Apr 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 23 Jan 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 2 Dec 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 11 Nov 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 14 Oct 2011

ROP

Click to view