Jaibir vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION

Curative Petition (Criminal) No 4 of 2023 In Review Petition (Criminal) No 186 of 2022 In Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No 8992 of 2021

Jaibir ...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Uttar Pradesh ...Respondent

O R D E R

• 1 We have gone through the Curative Petition and the connected documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs Ashok Hurra1 .
• 2 The Curative Petition is dismissed.

…...…...….......………………....…CJI. [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud]

…...…...….......………………....…..J. [Sanjay Kishan Kaul]

…...…...….......………………....…..J. [K M Joseph]

…...…...….......………………....…..J. [Sanjiv Khanna]

…...…...….......………………....…..J. [Bela M Trivedi]

New Delhi; March 16, 2023

<span id="page-0-0"></span>1 (2002) 4 SCC 388

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CURATIVE PET(R) No. 4/2023 in R.P.(Crl.) No. 186/2022 in SLP(Crl) No. 8992/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-07-2022 in R.P.(Crl.) No. 186/2022 29-11-2021 in SLP(Crl) No. 8992/2021 passed by the Supreme Court of India)

JAIBIR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION )

Date : 16-03-2023 This petition was circulated today.

CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI

By Circulation

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

• 1 We have gone through the Curative Petition and the connected documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs Ashok Hurra2 .
• 2 The Curative Petition is dismissed.
• 3 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)

AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

(Signed order is placed on the file)

<span id="page-1-0"></span>2 (2002) 4 SCC 388