Purshotam Singh vs. State Of Haryana Through Land Acquisition Collector

\200ITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9285-9287/2016 AJIT SINGH AND ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HAYANA AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 20/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Office Report indicates that although by Order dated 9.9.2016 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the learned counsel for the petitioners for filing the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice issued to both the respondents, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

MG