C. Albert David vs. G. Vincent Thomas

ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.11 SECTION IV-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16503/2024

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-02-2024 in MFA No. 7225/2022 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru)

C. ALBERT DAVID & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

G. VINCENT THOMAS & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.162521/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )

WITH SLP(C) No. 13631/2024 (IV-A) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.137644/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date : 23-09-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu Prakash, AOR Ms. Anisha Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Divija Mahajan, Adv. Ms. Anjali Agarwal, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mrs. S. Susheela, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashwin Kumar D.s., Adv. Ms. Surbhi Mehta, AOR Mr. Ishan Roy Chowdhury, Adv.

Mrs. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pawan Reley, AOR Ms. Sreepriya K., Adv. Mr. Akshay Lodhi, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv. Ms. Simran Singh, Adv. Ms. Lashika Singh, Adv. Mr. Agrim Tandon, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Having heard learned senior counsel for the parties, we are

not inclined to entertain these special leave petitions in exercise of power under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, they are dismissed.

However, taking note of the nature of the lis involved, we are of the considered view that the suit bearing O.S. No. 1629/2020 pending before the Court of Principal City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, Karnataka, requires to be decided expeditiously uninfluenced by any observations made in the impugned order and also the order which was confirmed thereunder.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

(DR. NAVEEN RAWAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM)

DY. REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)