Government Of National Capital Territory Of Delhi Through Its Secretary vs. M. A. Usmani

$ITEM NO.64 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 26200/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/08/2016 in WPC No. 5888/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, impleadment, permission to file lengthy list of dates, permission to place addl. documents on record, permission to urge addl. grounds, interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 26224/2016 (With appln.(s) for impleadment, exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, permission to file lengthy list of dates, interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26432/2016 (With appln.(s) for impleadment, for permission to file lengthy list of dates, exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26426/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates, for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26560/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates, exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26470/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates, exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26590/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates, 1 SLP (C)No. 26200/2016 etc. exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, interim relief and Office Report) Date : 09/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gopal Subramanium, Adv. Mr. P. P. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Indira Jaising, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satyakam, Adv. Mr. Gautam Narayan, Adv. Mr. Prateek Chadha, Adv. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Adv. Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Adv. Mr. S. Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Darpan K. M., Adv. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Adv. Ms. Meher Dev, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Adv. Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dave, Adv. Mr. Shadan Farasat, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, AG.

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG. Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Adv. Ms. Diksha Rai, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Tamta, Adv. Mr. Atulesh Kumar Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gautam Khajanchi, Adv. Ms. Tara Narula, Adv. Ms. Gargi Khanna, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 2 SLP (C)No. 26200/2016 etc. Issue notice. Mr. B. K. Prasad, learned counsel, has put in appearance on behalf of the Union of India. Ms. Gargi Khanna, learned counsel, appears for respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 26426 of 2016. Let notice be served on the other unserved respondents. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Counter affidavits, if any, be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder affidavits may be filed within two weeks thereafter. Replies shall also be filed to applications seeking to urge additional grounds in the special leave petitions, to application seeking to file additional documents as well as to other Interlocutory Applications. We may record that Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General, has made a fervent plea that these special leave petitions filed by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi are not maintainable. He has also argued that affidavit in support of the petition is sworn in by the Deputy Chief Minister who is not competent to file this affidavit and the affidavit of Secretary should have been filed. These aspects shall be considered at the time of hearing. List the petitions on 15 th November, 2016. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

3