Suresh Kumar Agarwal vs. The State Of Odisha
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ITEM NO.4 | COURT NO.13 | SECTION II-B |
|---|---|---|
| SUPREME COURT OF INDIA<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | ||
| Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8993/2023 | ||
| (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-07-2023<br>in ABLAPL No. 4760/2023 passed by the High Court Of Orissa At<br>Cuttack) | ||
| SURESH KUMAR AGARWAL & ANR.<br><b>VERSUS</b><br>THE STATE OF ODISHA & ORS. | Petitioner(s) | |
| Respondent(s) | ||
| Date: 04-03-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. | ||
| CORAM :<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL | ||
| For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Prasenjit Keswani, Adv.<br>Ms. Ranjeeta Rohtagi, Adv.<br>Ms. Sonia Dube, Adv.<br>Mr. Kumar Vaibhaw, Adv.<br>Ms. Kanchan Yadav, Adv.<br>Ms. Surbhi Anad, Adv.<br>Mr. Upmanyu Tewari, Adv.<br>Mr. Tanishq Sharma, Adv.<br>Ms. Saumya Sharma, Adv.<br>M/S. Legal Options, AOR | ||
| For Respondent(s) Ms. Anindita Pujari, AOR<br>Ms. Radhika Rani Mohapatra, Adv.<br>Mr. Shaileshwar Yadav, Adv.<br>Ms. Bhumika Chouksey, Adv.<br>Mr. Shibashish Misra, AOR<br>MR. Lalit Mishra, Adv. | ||
| Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR | ||
| <b>UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following</b><br>ORDER |
Dejic Formation<br>VARIA TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIRECT AND TACK<br>DIR challenge the order dated 11.07.2023 passed by the High Court of Odisha at Cuttack, whereby the application for grant of
anticipatory bail was rejected.
2. FIR No.209 of 2023 dated 04.05.2023 has been registered against the petitioners, alleging commission of offences under Sections 498A, 341, 294,307,323,500,509 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for the State of Odisha and also the learned counsel appearing for the De-facto complainant/respondent no.2.
4. On 08.08.2023, this Court passed an order to the effect that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners till the next date of listing and the interim protection stands extended from time to time.
5. After hearing the learned counsel on both sides and perusing the materials available on record, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the special leave petition by directing that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be enlarged on bail subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the Investigating Agency.
6. The petitioners shall also continue to cooperate with the investigation and shall appear before the investigating officer as and when required.
2
7. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(VARSHA MENDIRATTA) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)