Bhula Ram vs. State Of Haryana
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
>ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19615/2010
BIMLA DEVI & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR Respondent(s)
(With office report )
WITH
SLP(C) NO. 19845 of 2010
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 20178 of 2010
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 20226 of 2010
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 20271 of 2010
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 20683 of 2010
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 20701 of 2010
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 6881 of 2011
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 6943 of 2011
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 8001 of 2011
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 8829 of 2011
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 8917 of 2011
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 8918 of 2011
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 8919 of 2011
Item No.23
SLP(C) NO. 8954 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 8955 of 2011
(With office report) SLP(C) NO. 8920 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 8921 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 8922 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 8953 of 2011 (With office report)
(With office report) SLP(C) NO. 9014 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 9015 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 9017 of 2011 (With office report) Date: 15/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Anupam Raina, Adv. Mrs.Rekha Palli,Adv. Dr Ramesh K Haritash, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, ADv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Naresh Bakshi, ADv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner in SLP(C) No. 19615,19845,20178,20226,20271,20683,20701 of 2010 present. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner in SLP(C) Nos. 6881,6943,9014,8953,8829,8955,8920,9015,8921,8918,8919,8917, 9017,8001 of 2011 present. SLP(C) NO.20178/2010 The ld. Counsel for the respondent to file counter affidavit within four weeks.
-3-
Item No.23
Office report is not clear about the service position of the respondents in all the above matters.
Office report only says that the ld. Counsel, Mr Manjit Singh has not filed vakalatnama but it does not state as to which are all the respondents who are already been served and remain unrepresented in the matter.
Therefore, office is directed to give a clear and
complete report of the same.
List again on 1.11.2011.
(H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRAR